Friday, September 7, 2007

five new classes: initial impressions

As a minority at a historically black university I’m no stranger to invidious stares.

Even still, the semester continues to go smoothly and, as luck would have it, an exam has been postponed such that I can now make the time to post in detail about my new classes. They are, in the order that I attend them, as follows:

Word Power: As you might guess, this is an English vocab-building class. We began with a chapter on diction, which has proven both easy and helpful thus far. I’ll be the first to admit that, while I have better diction skills than the majority of my peers, there is certainly room for improvement. Something tells me that the rest of the semester will continue in this manner. I hope to get as much out of it as possible, and I believe it will prove to be an excellent grad school/GRE prep class.
My professor is Mr. Feazele (he hasn’t implied that he holds a Ph.D., and does not refer to himself as “Dr.” so I believe I’m correct in referring to him as “Mr.”). He is my lone white professor this semester. He has a tendency to ramble, but I can hardly hold that against him because the subject of words can be quite boring without a little deviation here and there.

Cultural Anthropology: This class is, of course, a social-science class. It is much as the name implies: an introductory course to cultural anthropology (as opposed to biological, archaeological, or linguistic anthropology). Seeing as how I was recently considering graduate studies in archaeological anthropology, I believe that this class will also prove valuable for my future scholastic endeavors. For this class, in lieu of a final exam, I must create a personal artifact. This will require some serious consideration.
My professor for this class is Dr. Taylor. She is an adjunct professor which, as best I can tell, means she only teaches part-time and has a real job somewhere else. She’s from the North East U.S. but she has taught and/or studied in many other parts of the world. She is very serious, but still manages to teach in an engaging manner. I think we’ll get along just fine.

Cultural Geography: This class is actually offered by my own department, the History Department. It seems like it will be an interesting angle for a geography class, and with the emphasis on cultural diversity, it seems to be right up my alley. I’ve been placed in a study group with ten other folks and assigned the country of Nigeria for my cultural research. That research will extend out of the classroom and immerse me into the native culture (as much as possible). The dual requirements of the out-of-class research are to attend a religious service and eat at a restaurant that most closely resembles the native religion and cuisine of our country. This should prove interesting since, due to a lack of Nigerian religion and cuisine, we’ll be improvising as best we can with the professor’s blessing.
My professor for this class is Dr. Thompson. She only teaches two classes because she also serves as the Director of the Center for Student Professional Development, which offers a mentorship-tutorial program that I have joined. I like Dr. Thompson because it is obvious from her demeanor that she is genuinely concerned about her students and wants them to do their best.

Introduction to Political Science: Another social science course. I hope to get a lot out of this class, too, although I despise the textbook. It’s difficult to explain, but there’s just something about the way it’s written that confuses and frustrates me. Being the conscientious student that I am, however, I purchased myself two supplemental books for cheap on the internet, and I’ve been making do in the meanwhile by consulting Wikipedia. So far this hasn’t resulted in any tragedies; only time will tell if I’ll out of there with an A by doing it this way.
My professor for this class is Dr. Ighoavada. He is from Nigeria, but he’s been here for over thirty years. He’s very passionate and I genuinely enjoy his lectures, but I have to pay very close attention to understand what he’s trying to convey.

Introduction to Philosophy: This is another class offered by my own department, the History (and Philosophy) Department. And this is another class that I will thoroughly enjoy. I’ve considered myself an amateur philosopher for many years, and now, at long last I have the opportunity to gain some formal training on the matter. This will certainly prove advantageous for my future in academia.
My professor for this class is Dr. Banks. He is a reverend, but his teaching is not biased in any apparent way by his faith, and for that he has my utmost respect. He is also a passionate lecturer, and I believe we will have an enjoyable semester.

And those are my classes. I truly feel that this semester will help me to grow academically, and thoroughly prepare me for graduate school. Each semester I spend at JSU I feel more at home there and I’m quite sure that by the time I arrive an unknown grad school in the future I’ll be missing the time spent here.

Alas, as I continue to write the hour grows ever later, but 6am patiently awaits with no regard for how much sleep I get and, considering that I have my first exam of the semester at 8am, I’d be well served to call it quits and get some rest.

Tuesday, August 28, 2007

so it begins

The new semester is off to a smooth start. I believe I’ll thoroughly enjoy all of my classes that I’ve thus far attended. The only class I have yet to attend is my philosophy 101 class, which meets only once a week on Thursday evening, and since classes started last Friday, this Thursday will be the first meeting of that class.

Once I’ve been to all of my classes I’ll post my impressions and expectations of each. In the meanwhile, I have studying to do if I hope to stay ahead.

Thursday, August 23, 2007

new semester's eve

Tomorrow marks the official beginning of my last semester as an undergraduate. Yay!

As for today, I had a conversation that resulted in some food for thought…

Husband and I were discussing computers and microchips and transistors. Before long the conversation had moved to digital vs. analog computing. The interesting conclusions reached were (1) I am an analog computer, and (2) digital technology represents one of those revolutions that will forever change the way humans exist.

Both of these ideas demand further consideration and investigation.

Wednesday, August 8, 2007

a recurring theme

Science and society.

Technology and culture.

I can't stop thinking about these things. Every day in every way I am reminded of the primacy of this line of investigation.

The relationships of human-created material technologies to socio-cultural technologies are vastly complex, weaving immensely tangled webs throughout the history of my human family.

Material and socio-cultural technologies exist together as symbiotic creatures, each taking what it can from the other and in doing so influencing the development of one another.

Sunday, July 15, 2007

a few socio-cultural technologies

In keeping with my new theory, I’ve been noticing instances of socio-cultural technologies everywhere. Here’s my preliminary list:

  • gender roles
  • religious dogma
  • eugenics
  • race
  • kinship systems
  • nationalism

Saturday, June 9, 2007

science, society, and my academic future

I’ve been doing a lot of thinking since the semester has ended (and not enough reading of bound, properly published materials - although I’ve certainly been doing enough online, digital materials), and I believe that I want to pursue my graduate studies in the history of science and society.

It makes perfect sense! For what is agriculture, and the social changes that accompanied agriculture - which so facinate me! - but a case study in the ancient history of science and society? Research avenues would abound, and the field would give me room to study ancient technologies as well as more contemorary technological phenomena.

I have this idea to redefine technology to include not only material adaptations made by humanity, but also less tangible adaptations, specifically, socio-cultural technology. And I wonder, is this allowed? Hasn’t someone else thought of this before? And, if they have, can I find a unique perspective?

Obviously, socio-cultural technology and material technology are intimately connected to one another. These relationships are what I want to study, but I have to pick a single inquiry that I can realistically pursue within the context of a master’s thesis. . .

I think the next step is to arrange a metting with the professor who first introduced me to the history of science and society to ponder potential research topics. . .

Tuesday, May 8, 2007

small pond

Just one more exam to survive, but before that I must act as a peer reviewer for three more researchers in my History Research Seminar, and after these two things pass I’ll be free to celebrate the official end of the semester.

The Earth and Space science exam doesn’t have me too worried. After the last exam I was only twenty points shy of an A for the semester, and I’ve gotten at least 12 bonus points since then, so I could feasibly fail this last exam horribly and still get out of the class with that A.

My eugenics exam went fairly well, too. Only five questions, and one was a repeat of a question from the midterm (for which I scored all available points). Two of them I more or less wrote a seat of my pants treatise based on whatever came to mind that was remotely related to the question at hand, but I think that my other three answers will make up for that bit of fudging.

The task I dread the most is the peer review process. Mostly this is because not a single one of the three papers I’ve been assigned to read and review have been submitted to me. I take no comfort in the fact that these people have already been told by the instructor that their final grade will be reduced by one full letter grade because they did not have the papers available last Wednesday, as they were instructed.

I’m distraught because I made an unrequired effort to help these people get their papers to me via e-mail, allowing them extra time beyond what the professor allowed. And yet, here I am, only twenty-five hours before I’m supposed to turn in my peer review comments to the professor as a portion of my grade, and not one of the three has e-mailed their paper to me. Alas.

Meanwhile, I stayed up until 2:00 a.m. on multiple occassions perfecting my paper for submission on the required date, one week prior to my own presentation. While this is encouraging in that it bolsters my confidence in my own abilities, it is nonetheless disconcerting - for some reason I would like to not be the exception, and not feel like such a big fish in a small pond. In no small part this is because I fear that my entry to grad school will be a rude awakening when I find myself in a more competitive environment where other people actively put forth effort and actually care about their studies, too.